Page 2 of 3

Re: Ban proposal

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:08 pm
by M.Magis
I’d guess bump stocks will be the victim here, pardon the poor choice of words. The sad part is it won’t make anyone safer, but will give the antis a feather in their cap. Tannerite may also be in trouble. Every idiot seems to be talking about the 50 lbs he had and the damage it could do, ignoring the 1600 lbs of amonium nitrite.

Re: Ban proposal

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:26 pm
by Caustic Burno
M.Magis wrote:I’d guess bump stocks will be the victim here, pardon the poor choice of words. The sad part is it won’t make anyone safer, but will give the antis a feather in their cap. Tannerite may also be in trouble. Every idiot seems to be talking about the 50 lbs he had and the damage it could do, ignoring the 1600 lbs of amonium nitrite.


Again the black guns, tannerite and all the gadgets that will go on an AR have an allure to the nut.

Re: Ban proposal

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:31 pm
by True Grit Farms
Caustic Burno wrote:
M.Magis wrote:I’d guess bump stocks will be the victim here, pardon the poor choice of words. The sad part is it won’t make anyone safer, but will give the antis a feather in their cap. Tannerite may also be in trouble. Every idiot seems to be talking about the 50 lbs he had and the damage it could do, ignoring the 1600 lbs of amonium nitrite.


Again the black guns, tannerite and all the gadgets that will go on an AR have an allure to the nut.


Or you could be an idiot for not owning a couple of AR type rifles. I hear the same crap all the time from my wife "you can only shoot one at a time" the way I see it is, you might as well be prepared.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:40 pm
by Caustic Burno
I am not that paranoid Grit.
If you gave me two I would trade them out at the local gun shop.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:51 am
by snoopdog
Won't make anyone safer, but I'm guessing bumpstocks , and trigger systems , possibly drum magazines . I have no use for any of them

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:19 am
by Caustic Burno
snoopdog wrote:Won't make anyone safer, but I'm guessing bumpstocks , and trigger systems , possibly drum magazines . I have no use for any of them


Who needs a 50 round drum for a Glock? This is the kind of stuff that hurts us IMOO.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:31 am
by dun
Caustic Burno wrote:
snoopdog wrote:Won't make anyone safer, but I'm guessing bumpstocks , and trigger systems , possibly drum magazines . I have no use for any of them


Who needs a 50 round drum for a Glock? This is the kind of stuff that hurts us IMOO.

Need has nothing to do with it. As long as it isn;t used illegally there is nothing wrong with it other then perception. I know perception becomes reality but who's business is it if I want a drum magazine or a speed loader for my revolver or 750 hp engine in a Honda Civic.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:53 am
by Caustic Burno
Agreed Dun but your Honda isn't street legal either.
The problem with both is the nut case that will use them illegally are drawn to them.
I agree it is the camels nose under the tent. This goes back to the bigger problem is we are not the majority.
Keep scaring the crap out of them we loose.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:06 am
by True Grit Farms
Caustic Burno wrote:Agreed Dun but your Honda isn't street legal either.
The problem with both is the nut case that will use them illegally are drawn to them.
I agree it is the camels nose under the tent. This goes back to the bigger problem is we are not the majority.
Keep scaring the crap out of them we loose.


We're going to loose because there's to many people that talk the talk and aren't willing to fight and defend our rights.
A BB gun scares the crap out of a anti gunner, and the anti gun crowd won't stop till they win it all. It's a shame some folks can't or won't see the picture, because it doesn't affect them.....yet.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:57 am
by greybeard
I kinda have to question the mental state of anyone who would want a Honda Civic, regardless of the HP. It's still a dang Civic.. :P
:hide:

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:06 am
by Caustic Burno
True Grit Farms wrote:
Caustic Burno wrote:Agreed Dun but your Honda isn't street legal either.
The problem with both is the nut case that will use them illegally are drawn to them.
I agree it is the camels nose under the tent. This goes back to the bigger problem is we are not the majority.
Keep scaring the crap out of them we loose.


We're going to loose because there's to many people that talk the talk and aren't willing to fight and defend our rights.
A BB gun scares the crap out of a anti gunner, and the anti gun crowd won't stop till they win it all. It's a shame some folks can't or won't see the picture, because it doesn't affect them.....yet.


HeII Grit your one of the ones scaring them to death.
Paranoia is scary.
I own an AR and some Garands you will never see them .

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:52 pm
by skyhightree1
Well i decided to buy a couple more black guns and an embarrassing amount of clips today.
Got Ruger ar in 5.56

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:53 pm
by skyhightree1

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:52 pm
by snoopdog
dun wrote:
Caustic Burno wrote:
snoopdog wrote:Won't make anyone safer, but I'm guessing bumpstocks , and trigger systems , possibly drum magazines . I have no use for any of them


Who needs a 50 round drum for a Glock? This is the kind of stuff that hurts us IMOO.

Need has nothing to do with it. As long as it isn;t used illegally there is nothing wrong with it other then perception. I know perception becomes reality but who's business is it if I want a drum magazine or a speed loader for my revolver or 750 hp engine in a Honda Civic.
It's nobody's business , but the guy that killed 58 people was a law abiding gun owner until he pulled the trigger the first time . Believe me , i know it's semantics but let them have it, and live to fight another day.

Re: Ban proposals

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:20 pm
by slick4591
I read earlier where the NRA agreed with the libs about the accessories that simulate full auto. From a law enforcement perspective those scare the he!! out of me. I'll try to find the link again.