Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Let us know who you are.
cjmc
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:52 am

Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby cjmc » Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:12 am

Hello all,

I really liked reading a few of the threads and saw a lot of mineral & ration posts/questions that I would be qualified to shed some light on. I graduated from Kansas State with a masters degree with a focus in beef cattle nutrition awhile back since then I worked for a mineral company as a nutritionist/sales rep & now I work as a feedlot nutritionists. Feel free to message me if you do have questions otherwise i'll chime in form time to time on the boards. Looking forward to arguing with everyone :D
0 x

User avatar
sim.-ang.king
GURU
GURU
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: Southern IL
Contact:

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby sim.-ang.king » Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:36 pm

Bovatec or Rumensin?
0 x
I'm Conservative so you can be Liberal.

talltimber
GURU
GURU
Posts: 1226
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:29 pm
Location: Southeast Missouri

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby talltimber » Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:42 pm

Welcome cjmc, you're input will be welcome I'm sure. Thanks for registering, and don't let them run you off.
0 x
If you cross the river before, leave a good horse on this side.

User avatar
Son of Butch
GURU
GURU
Posts: 3870
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:44 pm
Location: Frost Bite Falls, Minnesota

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby Son of Butch » Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:27 pm

:welcome: a board!
0 x

A.J.
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: NE Tennessee

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby A.J. » Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:42 pm

:welcome:
0 x

User avatar
TennesseeTuxedo
Mentor
Mentor
Posts: 10376
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:49 pm
Location: Live in Franklin, TN farm in Warsaw, KY

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby TennesseeTuxedo » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:50 am

I hear cattle eat a lot if grass. Is that true?
0 x
Time for a snappy new signature.

User avatar
True Grit Farms
GURU
GURU
Posts: 4509
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:29 pm
Location: Middle Georgia

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby True Grit Farms » Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:03 am

TennesseeTuxedo wrote:I hear cattle eat a lot if grass. Is that true?


Not if the cows are on alfalfa or clover.
Daily tip, " don't believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see."
0 x
If we'd of know this we'd of picked our own cotton.

User avatar
TCRanch
GURU
GURU
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 9:21 am
Location: Winfield, KS

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby TCRanch » Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:05 am

Welcome - as I'm sitting here in my K State sweatshirt :)
0 x

User avatar
Rafter S
GURU
GURU
Posts: 3858
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:13 am
Location: Grimes County, TX

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby Rafter S » Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:50 am

Welcome. It will be nice to have someone here that actually knows what he (or she) is talking about. :tiphat:
0 x
"I spent half my money on wine, women, and song.....and like a fool I squandered the rest." - Benny Hill

cjmc
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:52 am

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby cjmc » Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:56 am

sim.-ang.king wrote:Bovatec or Rumensin?


Wow, couldn't you have given me an easier question to start off with?
There are a lot of different facets to this question (receiving cattle, feedlot cattle, stockers, and cows) I will try & explain my thoughts on them all. For the record the old school thinking has always been Rumensin on high concentrate diets, bovatec on high roughage diets.

Backgrounder/Receiving diets-Rumensin will reduce dry matter intake, and is known to be unpalatable, unlike Bovatec it is NOT approved by the FDA to be fed in combination with CTC. Because of this, if I was a backgrounder I would choose Bovatec over rumensin. Yes it is slightly more expensive, but if the cattle get up to the bunk & eat better it will be worth it. Some people will still choose rumesin because its cheaper (but they won't feed it until the cattle are starting to get up on feed). In most instances the rumesin is mixed in with the mineral, so they also didn't feed mineral for the first 3-5 days! Minerals are very important for vaccines to work, so you want it in the diet ASAP. I think Bovatec in these types of situations has more advantages than rumensin.

Feedlot cattle-Rumenisn, not really any debate here.

Stockers- BV here again, only one approved to be fed with CTC & if your vet will let you put it in, CTC is your best friend on grass cattle. If you can't feed CTC then I would still probably suggest BV (but that's not exactly what I might do :D ). The one thing about RU in a free choice mineral is they don't eat it very well because its unpalatable (in my experience it cuts intake in 1/2)

Cows-This is one area most cow-calf producers are missing out, I think like only 5-10% of cows are on Ru? (BV is not approved to fed to pregnant females) I don't think I would feed RU year round (I would leave it out of my free-choice mineral before & during breeding because I want to make sure they are eating the recommend amount of mineral). If i'm feeding the cows with the mixer wagon its be nice sure going to be in there. RU improves feed efficiency & kills cocci. Most years the improved feed efficiency will more than pay for the RU (and in some years it might pay for the entire mineral package), then less cocci to boot, big win! If I had a custom mineral I would play with the level of sweetener in the mineral until I was satisfied with intake, then I might even feed it year round. Also some mineral companies may not do this because ionospheres are supposed to be force fed. The company I worked for just put "force feed at this level each day" and sold it anyway. Most companies in the area I worked in seemed to do that. Only one wouldn't do it.

Disclaimer- This is only my opinion. This is not advice.
0 x

User avatar
midTN_Brangusman
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:18 pm
Location: Unionville, TN

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby midTN_Brangusman » Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:14 pm

Welcome friend!
0 x
Backward B Ranch
Registered Brangus Cattle

User avatar
TN Cattle Man
GURU
GURU
Posts: 2558
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:16 am
Location: Palmyra, TN

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby TN Cattle Man » Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:55 pm

:welcome: to the Boards!!
0 x
As for me and my house... We will Serve the Lord!

User avatar
reeler
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:30 pm
Location: Land of Oz

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby reeler » Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:53 am

Welcome :welcome: Thanks for your informative post
0 x

User avatar
sim.-ang.king
GURU
GURU
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: Southern IL
Contact:

Re: Nutritionist who enjoyed some of the threads

Postby sim.-ang.king » Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:09 pm

cjmc wrote:
sim.-ang.king wrote:Bovatec or Rumensin?


Wow, couldn't you have given me an easier question to start off with?
There are a lot of different facets to this question (receiving cattle, feedlot cattle, stockers, and cows) I will try & explain my thoughts on them all. For the record the old school thinking has always been Rumensin on high concentrate diets, bovatec on high roughage diets.

Backgrounder/Receiving diets-Rumensin will reduce dry matter intake, and is known to be unpalatable, unlike Bovatec it is NOT approved by the FDA to be fed in combination with CTC. Because of this, if I was a backgrounder I would choose Bovatec over rumensin. Yes it is slightly more expensive, but if the cattle get up to the bunk & eat better it will be worth it. Some people will still choose rumesin because its cheaper (but they won't feed it until the cattle are starting to get up on feed). In most instances the rumesin is mixed in with the mineral, so they also didn't feed mineral for the first 3-5 days! Minerals are very important for vaccines to work, so you want it in the diet ASAP. I think Bovatec in these types of situations has more advantages than rumensin.

Feedlot cattle-Rumenisn, not really any debate here.

Stockers- BV here again, only one approved to be fed with CTC & if your vet will let you put it in, CTC is your best friend on grass cattle. If you can't feed CTC then I would still probably suggest BV (but that's not exactly what I might do :D ). The one thing about RU in a free choice mineral is they don't eat it very well because its unpalatable (in my experience it cuts intake in 1/2)

Cows-This is one area most cow-calf producers are missing out, I think like only 5-10% of cows are on Ru? (BV is not approved to fed to pregnant females) I don't think I would feed RU year round (I would leave it out of my free-choice mineral before & during breeding because I want to make sure they are eating the recommend amount of mineral). If i'm feeding the cows with the mixer wagon its be nice sure going to be in there. RU improves feed efficiency & kills cocci. Most years the improved feed efficiency will more than pay for the RU (and in some years it might pay for the entire mineral package), then less cocci to boot, big win! If I had a custom mineral I would play with the level of sweetener in the mineral until I was satisfied with intake, then I might even feed it year round. Also some mineral companies may not do this because ionospheres are supposed to be force fed. The company I worked for just put "force feed at this level each day" and sold it anyway. Most companies in the area I worked in seemed to do that. Only one wouldn't do it.

Disclaimer- This is only my opinion. This is not advice.


Your hired, :welcome: to the board.
0 x
I'm Conservative so you can be Liberal.


Return to “Hi! I'm new here.”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests