Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Qail, Pheasant, Grouse hunters.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J Hoy" data-source="post: 1717890" data-attributes="member: 16398"><p>Pesticides have been banned in the past to save people and other animals, like Endrin, 2,4,5-T, DDT and others. If neonicotinoids and glyphosate were banned immediately, that would give the young people more time to address the other issues like the climate change issue and others. Also, livestock owners would not loose so much money to calves not surviving and weight loss due to underbite and digestive issues caused by those pesticides. I am trying to help the animals, and in doing so, help the livestock owners. Whether the livestock owners want to help themselves and their own livestock (and children) is up to them and like you say, we can't do anything about that issue. Since children are being born with the same birth defects and other health issues as the wild and domestic animals, which have been shown by thousands of studies to be caused by neonicotinoids and glyphosate working synergistically, it would seem that everyone with children would be on board with banning those pesticides as soon as possible. Why is there no concern for the affected children?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J Hoy, post: 1717890, member: 16398"] Pesticides have been banned in the past to save people and other animals, like Endrin, 2,4,5-T, DDT and others. If neonicotinoids and glyphosate were banned immediately, that would give the young people more time to address the other issues like the climate change issue and others. Also, livestock owners would not loose so much money to calves not surviving and weight loss due to underbite and digestive issues caused by those pesticides. I am trying to help the animals, and in doing so, help the livestock owners. Whether the livestock owners want to help themselves and their own livestock (and children) is up to them and like you say, we can't do anything about that issue. Since children are being born with the same birth defects and other health issues as the wild and domestic animals, which have been shown by thousands of studies to be caused by neonicotinoids and glyphosate working synergistically, it would seem that everyone with children would be on board with banning those pesticides as soon as possible. Why is there no concern for the affected children? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Qail, Pheasant, Grouse hunters.
Top