Another shot dead by Mpls police

A friendly place for chat, rumors, gossip and jokes.
Post Reply
User avatar
CottageFarm
-
Posts: 1961
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:44 pm
Location: Central Texas
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by CottageFarm » Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:45 pm

farmguy wrote:
Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:06 pm
Greybeard I respect your opinion . However when things have been slow for a long time then "bang" fire is coming from a hooch. You return fire into the hooch not at a specific target. How do you know who is all in the hooch, one VC? A family? or what did you do? I assume you would not wait to defend yourself until you somehow determined who was in the hooch. Thank you for your service.
Do you find your "hypothetical" above to be truly analogous to the situation with officer Noor??
I find it incredibly alarming that anyone would find it acceptable for LEO in the US to , under routine circumstances, equate the citizenry to an enemy combatant. I appreciate your service, but I find your equivocation to be....unsettling...I will leave it at that.


Discontent is the want of self-reliance. Ralph Waldo Emerson
"He that lives upon CF's CFS alone, will die fasting" :lol2: Ouachita

farmguy
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:20 pm
Location: Minnesota
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by farmguy » Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:28 pm

NO it is not analogous to the officer Noor shooting. If you recall we were discussing Viet Nam. Nor was I equating the "enemy" to citizens. My point was that there was no premeditation or financial gain in the Noor case. Rather it was terrible mistake made in a second. Officer Noor was put on the fast track to be an officer. Obviously Mr. Noor was not a good officer. I assume he was very scared and reacted incorrectly. My point was and is what would be the benefit to society in putting this man in Jail. I believe your "equivocation" was premature before fully reading the posts. thank you. farmguy

User avatar
Carpenter2n
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 pm
Location: Cental Texas
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Carpenter2n » Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:59 pm

So nobody convicted of Manslaughter or 3rd degree homicide should go to jail?
I started out an expert then spent the rest of my life learning all the things I didn't know....

Breathing is highly underrated!

farmguy
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:20 pm
Location: Minnesota
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by farmguy » Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:26 pm

Carpenter2n: A rainy day so on the internet.

1.Third degree murder can be defined as homicide committed with the intention of causing bodily harm, but not necessarily death. It can be a killing that results from indifference or negligence or recklessness. Statutes defining third degree murder vary considerably from state to state.

1.manslaughter - homicide without malice aforethought. homicide - the killing of a human being by another human being. chance-medley - an unpremeditated killing of a human being in self defense.

1.accidental death. noun. : death by accidental means usually sudden and violent also : death occurring as the unforeseen and chance result of an intended act.


In my opinion that must be decided on a case by case basis. For example did you knowingly drive drunk that resulted in a death? Were you texting while driving knowing the dangers? Were you defending yourself from an attack? Did you initiate a fight and an unplanned death occurred? Did you knowingly sell a defective item or make a repair that resulted in death? So no not every case should result in no punishment. That is why we have judges and juries.

User avatar
Carpenter2n
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 pm
Location: Cental Texas
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Carpenter2n » Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:46 pm

you said
"My point was and is what would be the benefit to society in putting this man in Jail"


I was trying to determine whether you feel everyone convicted of manslaughter and 3rd degree murder should not be punished? ( jail is punishment. period.) You apparently feel some should and some shouldn't, regardless of a judge and jury having done their job. Why do you feel this specific man should not be punished for the crime for which he was convicted?

The general reason it benefits society to put people in jail after they have been convicted of a crime to uphold the law.
I started out an expert then spent the rest of my life learning all the things I didn't know....

Breathing is highly underrated!

User avatar
greybeard
Mentor
Mentor
Posts: 18832
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:51 pm
Location: Cleveland Tx
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by greybeard » Wed Jul 17, 2019 6:50 pm

For example did he knowingly pull the trigger of a gun that resulted in a death? =yes
Were you a member of a police force, knowing the dangers?=Yes
Were you defending yourself from an attack?=No
Did you initiate a fight and an unplanned death occurred? =Yes

Those, are the facts of the case.

He killed an unarmed woman for no good reason.
He deserves life in prison. He got off light.
"For evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing" Burke
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It ain't easy being a used cow salesman.

User avatar
greybeard
Mentor
Mentor
Posts: 18832
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:51 pm
Location: Cleveland Tx
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by greybeard » Wed Jul 17, 2019 6:51 pm

Carpenter2n wrote:
Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:46 pm
you said
"My point was and is what would be the benefit to society in putting this man in Jail"


I was trying to determine whether you feel everyone convicted of manslaughter and 3rd degree murder should not be punished? ( jail is punishment. period.) You apparently feel some should and some shouldn't, regardless of a judge and jury having done their job. Why do you feel this specific man should not be punished for the crime for which he was convicted?
I'd like to hear the answers to those 2 questions myself, and I'd like to hear the justification for the answers.

IMO, the benefit to society is that a long sentence would make others think twice before just pulling the trigger.
"For evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing" Burke
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It ain't easy being a used cow salesman.

farmguy
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:20 pm
Location: Minnesota
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by farmguy » Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:07 pm

I was not on the jury or in the court room, nor were you. I expressed my opinion. The judge and jury decided and that is the situation today. I expressed my thoughts and why the grilling? I am sorry my opinions do not agree with yours. I feel this man was put into a situation that he was not prepared for. I guess I do not understand how first the leap was made that I equated combat and police work. Then by my questioning if jail time would benefit society in this case I am being asked if any one convicted of Manslaughter or third degree murder should be punished. I do not understand the assumptions being expressed.

User avatar
Carpenter2n
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 pm
Location: Cental Texas
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Carpenter2n » Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:18 pm

We are simply trying to understand why you feel he is entitled to escape punishment.
Why do you feel it would NOT benefit society to punish him for his crime.
Lots of people do things that have unintended consequences, including the drunk driver. Most drunk drivers don't INTEND to kill someone, yet we certainly demand they be punished if they do.

You did make an analogy to Vietnam combat to make your point earlier.
I started out an expert then spent the rest of my life learning all the things I didn't know....

Breathing is highly underrated!

farmguy
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:20 pm
Location: Minnesota
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by farmguy » Thu Jul 18, 2019 6:59 am

We will have to agree to disagree here. My reference to Viet Nam was when Greybeard talked about being punished in the military when a civilian was killed. I was simple being very honest about warfare and civilian casualties. The drunk driver you referenced made decisions to drink and too excess. He or she also made a decision to drive. These decisions were made over a relatively long period of time. The Noor decision was made in a second or two. Yes I respect the juries decision. But I also know the cost of incarcerating an individual and I also know that violent criminals are released on parole because of overcrowding. Due to limited facilities who goes in and who doesn't?

User avatar
Carpenter2n
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 pm
Location: Cental Texas
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Carpenter2n » Thu Jul 18, 2019 8:00 am

Self edited
I started out an expert then spent the rest of my life learning all the things I didn't know....

Breathing is highly underrated!

User avatar
greybeard
Mentor
Mentor
Posts: 18832
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:51 pm
Location: Cleveland Tx
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by greybeard » Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:46 pm

All offenders are to be treated equally under the law. That, is the law according to the constitution..the same constitution that backs our laws that police officers take an oath to defend.
The split second decision thing doesn't fly with me. Police officers are prone to remind us they put their lives on the line for US, the public. An ethical conflict? If they are putting more emphasis on the value of their own lives over the public's, then they are doing exactly opposite what they claim to be doing and there is no conflict..None of us get to have it both ways.
To Protect and to Serve.
It appears in at least this case, the officer was intent on protecting himself and serving his own self interest over the interest of the unarmed & innocent civilian.
"For evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing" Burke
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It ain't easy being a used cow salesman.

User avatar
Carpenter2n
Cowhand
Cowhand
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 pm
Location: Cental Texas
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Carpenter2n » Thu Jul 18, 2019 1:44 pm

Must not be raining.
I started out an expert then spent the rest of my life learning all the things I didn't know....

Breathing is highly underrated!

User avatar
Son of Butch
GURU
GURU
Posts: 6348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:44 pm
Location: Frost Bite Falls, Minnesota
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by Son of Butch » Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:16 am

greybeard wrote:
Wed Jul 17, 2019 6:50 pm
The law does not (and should not) allow for errors in judgment....
Dead is dead no matter what.
He killed an unarmed woman for no good reason.
All offenders are to be treated equally under the law.
He deserves life in prison. He got off light.
farmguy wrote: IMO that must be decided on a case by case basis.
That is why we have judges and juries.
Some believe circumstances matter, others see no difference or need for 1st degree, 2nd degree or 3rd degree charges. Dead is dead and any found guilty of any of them deserve life in prison. (period)
I guess that sums it up.

User avatar
greybeard
Mentor
Mentor
Posts: 18832
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:51 pm
Location: Cleveland Tx
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Another shot dead by Mpls police

Post by greybeard » Wed Jul 24, 2019 12:05 am

This guy got off extremely light too.
2 years, reduced rank to e-1 and a dishonorable discharge.
https://www.witn.com/home/headlines/Cam ... 49021.html
A Camp Lejeune Marine who admitted to shooting a fellow Marine at the main gate will spend at least the next two years in the brig.

Lance Corporal Brandon Little pleaded guilty Tuesday to involuntary manslaughter with culpable negligence, in return for the government dropping two other charges.

It was April 8th of this year when base officials said 21-year-old Lance Corporal Mark Boterf was shot and killed while on duty at the main gate.

The two Marines were performing sentry duty at the gate, and Little told the judge his M4 rifle accidentally went off as he was removing it, striking Boterf in the chest.

Government prosecutors asked Little be sentenced to five years in the brig, and kicked out of the Marine Corps.

The man's lawyers sought no confinement, instead asking Col. Debra McConnell to sentence Little to a lifetime of guilt, regret and torment.

Col McConnell sentenced Little to three years, but due to a pre-trial agreement, the Marine will only serve two years, while the last year will be suspended if he behaves himself in the brig.

Little will be reduced to private, and then given a dishonorable discharge when he is released from the brig.


Previous Story
A Marine accused of fatally shooting a fellow Marine at the main gate of Camp Lejeune will hear more about the sentencing in his case on Wednesday.

Lance Corporal Brandon Little was charged with dereliction of duty, negligent homicide, and involuntary manslaughter in the shooting.

Little waived his right to an Article 32 hearing, which is similar to a civilian grand jury, and pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter with culpable negligence.

He pleaded not guilty to negligent homicide and dereliction of duty. The government withdrew those other two charges and the guilty plea was accepted.

It was April 8th of this year when base officials said 21-year-old Lance Corporal Mark Boterf was shot and killed while on duty at the main gate.

On the stand, Little said he was working temporary duty at the main gate, and when traffic slacked off he would play with the M4's safety, switching it on and off.

Little said at the end of the shift, he went back to the guard shack to dismantle the weapon, and did not notice the rifle had racked itself back as he was taking it off. The Marine said it became caught on his walkie talkie, which was around his neck. Little testified that the safety was off and the weapon fired, hitting Boterf in the chest.
That last paragraph, is not what he later said actually happened.
He admitted intentionally racking the charging handle himself instead of properly clearing the weapon, and dropping the magazine and kept his finger on the trigger the whole time.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... /16907645/
"For evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing" Burke
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It ain't easy being a used cow salesman.

Post Reply