Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Feedyard Board
Transitioning to grass-fed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeanne - Simme Valley" data-source="post: 1823710" data-attributes="member: 968"><p>First - both reports I posted claimed GF was LOWER in FAT. That's a given. No argument.</p><p>In the summary you posted it reads:</p><p><em>Grass-fed also showed a more favorable SFA lipid profile containing less cholesterol-raising fatty acids (C12:0 to C16:0) but contained a lesser amount of cholesterol-lowering C18:0 than grain-fed beef.</em></p><p>OK ----- has LESS cholesterol-<strong>raising</strong> fatty acids BUT ----- has LESS cholesterol-<strong>lowering</strong>. Hmmmm</p><p>And the reports I posted discussed the Omega 3's, etc - but it still did not make it healthier.</p><p></p><p>OK FOLKS - is this a game changer????? That proved nothing to me.</p><p>As I originally said, read the two reports I posted. The Michigan report is one that this fancy worded one refers to, but somehow makes it sound a lot different. Mumbo Jumbo</p><p>Snake Oil - you name it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeanne - Simme Valley, post: 1823710, member: 968"] First - both reports I posted claimed GF was LOWER in FAT. That's a given. No argument. In the summary you posted it reads: [I]Grass-fed also showed a more favorable SFA lipid profile containing less cholesterol-raising fatty acids (C12:0 to C16:0) but contained a lesser amount of cholesterol-lowering C18:0 than grain-fed beef.[/I] OK ----- has LESS cholesterol-[B]raising[/B] fatty acids BUT ----- has LESS cholesterol-[B]lowering[/B]. Hmmmm And the reports I posted discussed the Omega 3's, etc - but it still did not make it healthier. OK FOLKS - is this a game changer????? That proved nothing to me. As I originally said, read the two reports I posted. The Michigan report is one that this fancy worded one refers to, but somehow makes it sound a lot different. Mumbo Jumbo Snake Oil - you name it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Feedyard Board
Transitioning to grass-fed
Top