i read in sim talk a new sync program where you leave the cidr in for 5 days and 2 shots of prostaglandin the second 2 hours after the first says they get 10% better conception on heifiers using this just wondering if anyone has tried this method.
bse":wn575gcw said:thanks for the reply Whitecow i think im gonna try it this time. could you tell if it was any better than the 7 day with one shot of prostoglanden?
The shots or 8 hours + or - 2 hours ---- so 6-10 hours apart.pdfangus":17r58uu1 said:The two shots are not 2 hours apart.
I have not yet used it but If I recall correctly the two shots are 12 hours apart.
the research for this new protocol so far has been very promising in terms of conceptions.
I guess I'm surprised there is a noticeable difference. Any ideas why a shot 6-10 hours apart would make a difference physiologically? I understand where a TAI would be necessary for bse and others that can't observe heats but for those that could observe heats, what would be the advantage of using this sync program? I would hate to run heifers through the chute 4 times just to get 1 breeding.whitecow":wwuof3f8 said:bse":wwuof3f8 said:thanks for the reply Whitecow i think im gonna try it this time. could you tell if it was any better than the 7 day with one shot of prostoglanden?
I've only used it twice so far, but the initial pregnancy rates were slightly higher - around 70% on about 20 heifers each time.
:clap: :clap:I would hate to run heifers through the chute 4 times just to get 1 breeding
Be sure to let us know how it turns out for you. I've grown to dislike CIDR's but if everybody is having the success they are claiming and you back that up, I may have to reconsider.bse":2v0pvcuw said:im definetly gonna use it on my hiefiers this fall i like what everyone is saying about the better conception rates. a friend of mine done a little expieriment on cows tried the 5 day with one shot of lut didnt work to well. thanks for all your replys and like i said ill be using this in the fall.
Well than lets work together because my problem is the exact opposite.Jeanne - Simme Valley":3qjooisa said:I have GREAT success getting cattle to cycle (show heat). But, I DON'T have much success as far as conception. CIDR's definately make them cycle, but they may not have a viable egg.
tncattle467":1f6th56w said:Jeanne - Simme Valley":1f6th56w said:Jim, I agree this looks like a better program - but COSTLY!
They hit on the problem with CIDRS,the follicles can get OLD (stale). ---"The younger, yet mature follicle should be more fertile, which should increase conception rates". With the CIDR, the cow's follicle is essentially "put on hold" til you pull the CIDR, so when she ovulates she comes into a good standing heat, but the egg isn't "fresh" enough to get fertilized.
Kinda like a fertilized chicken egg that sat around for a while, then you try to incubate it --- Doesn't hatch because it gets too old.
I have several cows each year. (Five thus far) that have dropped two calves in the same year or within a 12 month period instead of the normal 18 months. For example two calved in january of 08 and both calved again in december 08. We are talking old cows 10 years old and younger some older than 10. I asked my vet/embryologist about it and he said it could be that your mineral program is right where it needs to be. He said cattle that have a poor mineral program or are lacking in minerals do not breed back as good. Whether this is true or not I have the slightest idea. It does make sense. Since he is the expert I will listen to him.