dieselbeef
Well-known member
on road is dyed green
DOT checks it now. Had a friend get a 2000$ fine not to long ago.Angus Cowman":2xntjf1n said:DOT isn't the ones checking them in Mo and Ark it is the dept.OF Revenue who checked mine
Last year I got check by dept of revenue in Modenvermartinfarms":2qilk44o said:DOT checks it now. Had a friend get a 2000$ fine not to long ago.Angus Cowman":2qilk44o said:DOT isn't the ones checking them in Mo and Ark it is the dept.OF Revenue who checked mine
Yes, I'm sorry, I see what your saying now.Angus Cowman":2ehjoq6w said:Last year I got check by dept of revenue in Modenvermartinfarms":2ehjoq6w said:DOT checks it now. Had a friend get a 2000$ fine not to long ago.Angus Cowman":2ehjoq6w said:DOT isn't the ones checking them in Mo and Ark it is the dept.OF Revenue who checked mine
DOT can check also but fine is thru revenue dept
ram":1b6nrkz7 said:You are right Gimpyrancher. But the DOT is like their above the law.gimpyrancher":1b6nrkz7 said:I can carry drugs, illegal guns and whatever else I please in a vehicle. If I get pulled over, I have the right to refuse a search without a warrant. The key here is, you must verbally refused a search without a warrant. If they search for dyed fuel, without a warrant or some reasonable suspicion of a crime, why wouldn't you get the "evidence" thrown out of court because it is fruit of an illegal search?
Most don't have the round ones to refuse to allow any cop to search without a warrant. That is usually why they just go ahead and pay.
Seems to me, illegal use of dyed fuel and avoiding paying a hundred bucks in taxes is minor compared to illegal searches by any government agency.
I'm just saying . . . . op: